Let’s take a look at acrosticdoublespeak. It is essentially characterized by three components:
- a factually and grammatically correct statement,
- an acrostically encrypted message, and
- the humorous interplay between the two.
The book (and my accompanying blog) contains over 900 of these constructs, some reaching lengths of almost 60 significant letters.
The question arises, “How exactly was this book ever written?", given that our so-called conventional thought processes do not contain the requisite holistic scope to create 6,000 letters worth of these 3-dimensional structures.
( No need to believe me…see for yourself).
The key to the creation of the book is the recognition of nascent and pre-nascent patterns.
This recognition is derived, not from some weird kind of cleverness or some weird kind of neuronal circuitry. It is derived from something much more interesting…and maybe a whole lot weirder: an actual hypothesis.
This recognition represents the validation of an hypothesis that I have developed, an academically based, inter-disciplinary hypothesis, that has actually bore fruit. It is an hypothesis, the discussion of which will have to await my next book.
In the interim, however, may I be so bold, my dear reader, so as to burden you with a simple question, one for which I am actively seeking an answer.
I would appreciate it if you could please name for me a single book in English, written within the last 50 years, that can reasonably make the claim that it has utilized a novel modality of holistic thought, one that recognizes nascent patterns.
I have asked this simple question from many of my learned peers and colleagues.
An answer is still forthcoming.
I thank you.
Joshua Marvit, Ph.D. (writing under the pseudonym Milt Pupique)
P.S. If contemplating this subject gives you brainschmertz, why don’t’ you relax…with a few of the book’s constructs?
